Skip to main content

West Ham's stadium move has been a mixed success

Moving into a new stadium involves some risk for a club, but often a necessary one. Southampton could not have stayed at The Dell and maintained a solid presence in the Premier League. The Emirates may be less atmospheric than Highbury, and its cost may have held the club back for a while, but it generates much needed revenue for Arsenal. The problem at Sunderland and Middlesbrough is not the new stadiums, but the football played within them. Everton's failure to move away from the faded charms of Goodison Park has held them back. Liverpool decided to rebuild Anfield rather than move to Stanley Park, but their stadium is a very special place.

Manchester City's revival was helped by the move from the down market surroundings of Maine Road to the splendour of the City of Manchester Stadium, all at a very reasonable price. No doubt West Ham thought they could repeat the trick when they moved to the London Stadium in a deal which has been criticised for the level of taxpayer subsidy involved.

However, this move has not worked out quite as was hoped. The team has not moved up to a new competitive level and many fans remain dissatisfied. They feel that their new stadium is soulless in contrast to the Boleyn Ground at Upton Park. Fans face a long and boring walk from the various stations serving the stadium.

Paul Christmas, chairman of the West Ham United Independent Supporters' Association, told The Times, 'We are tenants in a semi-converted athletics stadium while our London rivals have or will have state-of-the-art purpose-built football stadiums.' Retractable seating across the athletics track was promised, but never arrived. Spurs and Chelsea are building new stadiums at their original grounds.

Admittedly, fans have shown their loyalty to the club by buying up the 52,000 season tickets on offer. There is some anecdotal evidence that new fans have been attracted with good transport links into Kent which is something of a football desert. Even so, the new stadium lacks the charged atmosphere of the Boleyn.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/