Skip to main content

An attendances paradox

The National League North and South divisions offer a similar level of football, but the North attracts far higher attendances. It has ten teams with average attendances of over 1,000 whereas the south divisions has no teams with an attendance above 1,000 (Dartford is top with 909).

Part of the explanation must be the presence of former Football League teams in the North division who have managed to hold on to a considerable portion of their core support. Stockport County still manage average attendances of 3,135 (despite Premier and Football League options nearby) while recently relegated York City attract 2,825. Next comes a rather special club, FC United of Manchester with 1,825 while Salford City with its high profile backers attracts 1,643. Then come another two Football League clubs, Kidderminster Harriers (1,533) and Darlington (1,511).

A similar pattern can be seen in the National League itself with four former Football League clubs heading the attendance table, headed by Tranmere Rovers with an impressive 5,058, followed by Wrexham, Leyton Orient and Hartlepool United.

However, this does not offer a complete explanation as there are three non-league clubs in the North division that have never played in the Football League but still attract average attendances of over 1,000: Chorley, AFC Telford and Harrogate Town. They are followed by two one time Football League clubs who have not held on to their support and have average attendances of around 1,000: Boston United and Southport.

Comments

  1. I think the higher attendances in NLN are helped by a larger away following of those ex league clubs you mention helping to push Chorley, Telford and Harrogate's attendances above the 1,000 mark.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  2. Accessibility plays a part I feel

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/