Skip to main content

Chelsea stadium cost rises to over £1bn

Chelsea have significantly increased the cost of redeveloping Stamford Bridge to more than £1bn, which would make it the most expensive stadium in Europe. This is double the £500m that was estimated when they received planning permission for the 60,000 capacity stadium. The cost of building Tottenham Hotspur's new ground has almost doubled to £800m.

Chelsea attribute the spiralling cost to the length and complexity of the build which will take five to six years compared with two at Tottenham. They will not vacate the stadium until 2020 when they will move to a temporary home for three or four years.

Chelsea have to build over the District Line and the Southern main line which pass close to Stamford Bridge. Their 'cathedral of football' will have a lavish external design.

Chelsea are talking to several investment banks about funding the project rather than relying solely on funds provided by Roman Abramovich. They will also attempt to sell a naming rights package that will retain Stamford Bridge in the title.

Chelsea are hopeful of securing a deal well in advance of moving into their new ground and are encouraging interested parties to submit bids before the end of the season, pointing out that an early agreement will give the naming rights partner several years of free publicity, as the new stadium will not be ready until 2023 or 2024.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/