Skip to main content

Bolton take relegation hit

The 2016-17 accounts for Bolton Wanderers and their parent company show the impact of relegation from the Championship: Financial results. Bolton are, of course, now back in the Championship and have every hope of staying up, although they are operating on one of the lowest budgets in the Championship.

Former owner Eddie Davies wrote off an eye watering £198m of debt, but there is still £22m of hard debt remaining. This includes £10m left in by Eddie Davies.

Relegation saw turnover slump from over £24m to £8.3m. The most important factor here was the decline in broadcasting revenue from £12.9m to £1.7m. Gate receipts fell marginally from £3.3m to £3.1m. Operating losses went up from £8m to £12.9m.

On the more positive side the wage bill of £12.6m was down by £6m. In 2011 it was £56m. The wages to turnover ratio of 63.4 per cent was lower than fifteen Championship clubs in 2016/17. In 2013 it was well over 100 per cent. Expenditure on sales and administration was cut by £4m which is a substantial amount and suggests that spending in this area was affected by the legacy of the club's days in the top flight. A £5.5m profit was made on player trading.

The club is clearly following a prudent path, while seeking to secure the larger revenue streams available in the Championship.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/